-
@Popehat Putting his past misdeeds aside, he did at least one thing openly on camera that disqualified him: exposing himself as a partisan political hack willing to parrot political and conspiratorial talking points. It disqualified him and it stains the court. This isn’t hard.
-
@Popehat The Supreme Court has weathered many allegedly rapey drunkards (reformed and otherwise) in its history. It can handle people chosen for judicial philosophies that serve political ends. Can it survive those chosen for their willingness to be openly partisan in the information age?