-
@NGrossman81 Rufo’s point, repeated openly by most who believe it, is that the mere existence of people the school board doesn’t approve of is illicit, and calling it “pornography” or “prurient” is simply the legal vehicle for their desired outcome.Permalink On twitter.com
❤️ 9 Favorites Mood +3 🙂
-
@NGrossman81 And of course, starting with the thin end of the wedge is the business model. First abortion, then contraception and pornography (something they can no longer define). First trans people, then gay people, Jews, or whoever else loses approval of the dominant faction in a town.Permalink On twitter.com
-
@NGrossman81 Incidentally, these extremists tend to openly admit the game. The idea being that the public is more behind "keep porn away from kids" than the real goal of "remove the people we don't like from public life with vast expansions of state coercion." nyti.ms/3j8XJVROn twitter.com
