-
@alexhazanov @joshuak08 @SeanTrende Just so, and the sole grounds for changing the standard as to whether public statements let courts look behind the text of a regulation seems to be that the Court (just this once) thinks the governor doesn’t get the same deference. And it’s clear this is a one-off in that regard.On twitter.com
❤️ 1 Favorite Mood +1 🙂
-
@alexhazanov @joshuak08 @SeanTrende And to speak to Dunn v Ray, it stood for the proposition that whatever his other strengths, Gorsuch is a blatant religious bigot. Murphy v. Collier turned out differently, and the reason given (timeliness of appeal) was false on the record's own terms.Permalink On twitter.com